Australia

4330 readers

328 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Liberals Plan To Blow Current Educator-to-Child Ratios To 1:50 (aussiechildcarenetwork.com.au)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a speech in NSW Parliament’s upper house yesterday, Ms Munro bluntly stated that regulations on ratios should change to cut costs in the sector.

“There are ways we can make childcare cheaper. We can change the regulations around educators who are childcare providers,” she said.

“We don’t need five or six highly educated people to look after 50 kids. Maybe we need one.”

This is a stark contrast to the current National Quality Framework, which mandates a maximum ratio of one educator for 10 children over three years old.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Or, another idea - we stop subsidising private schools and only give public money to public schools? I don't think the private school down the road really needs a fifth auditorium while the kids at the public school are sitting in the library for science class because there's literally nobody to teach it. But I guess we don't want the poors getting educated, can't have my landlords little princes and princesses competing with the peasant class for jobs.

I swear if anyone tells me they're voting LNP I'm going to have a really hard time not just punching them in the face.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

we stop subsidising private schools and only give public money to public schools?

I've always disliked this idea. I'm the product of public education and my kids are in public schools as well. I believe every kid has a right to government funding toward their education. If a rich family wants to spend fees above and beyond the government allotment so their kid goes to school with a swimming pool or rowing team, I am ok with it. Those kids shouldn't lose their government education funds because they come from wealth. They are still citizens and have the same entitlement.

Besides, if the million kids currently in private education suddenly turned up at their local schools tomorrow to enroll in the public system, they would totally break it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It creates unfair education access. Why should only those who can afford to pay ridiculous fees get better quality? Education should not be pay-to-win.

Same goes for healthcare and any other basic essentials, we do not need a two tiered approach to equality.

load more comments (4 replies)