this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13900 readers
672 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (30 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (22 children)

Like actually? just dont use AMAB and AFAB as nouns like that, its basically the same thing as saying "biological males" and "biological females" and just as impresice. ln your comment there you could have literally just said

So this law bans

  • jack off when cum
  • Gay sex when cum
  • sex where the one person is post menopausal or some shit, if the other person cum
  • lesbian sex where someone is non-reproductive for any reason, if someone else cum. including the rhythm method
  • period sex

and conveyed the exact same message without using that stupid ass dehumanizing lanaguge Hope that helps ----

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (20 children)

so you think everyone produces semen when they cum?

maybe you didn't understand this law is specifically about semen

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The issue is you implying that “amabs” produce semen

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

would that it be the issue.

and even more complicated by, as was pointed out, the issue of vasectomy. it is semen but it is not "genetic material".

like i said before this what not intended to describe in detail every specific situation that could arise, but to describe SOME OF THE KINDS of things that are contemplated by the law. the law is formulated in a cis-centric manner on purpose.

Was my list comprehensive? NO.

Didn't realize yall needed this: I am not a lawyer. Moreever I am not a Person Who Is A Sitting Judge On The US Supreme Court. (Would not want to "dehumanize" by referring to a "supreme court judge"--- I'm learning.) Super apologize for the confusion.

IT IS A STUPID LAW there is no way to talk about it that isn't stupid.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)