this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
4 points (70.0% liked)
Xbox
6084 readers
14 users here now
An Xbox community for Lemmy!
UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE
Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe
Rules:
- Stay on topic.
- No hate speech.
- No Politics.
- No console wars. We are all gamers.
- No Clickbait
- Be a decent human.
- No piracy talk or links to copywrited content.
QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:
New to Lemmy?
View the Getting Started Guide
Attributions:
Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg
Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pretty much the same situation as Vanguard, Sledgehammer is getting screwed with not nearly enough time. I expect it to be pretty rough at launch tbh, gonna probably pick it up with a discount a few seasons in.
Seriously: MW2 was rough for more than half a year and each season refresh brings back bugs already fixed. Vanguard is only two years away and could itself only have around two years of serious development time since it used the same engine as MW 2019, while Cold War used Treyarch‘s own stream. Even if Sledgehammer started development right after Vanguard they‘d only have two years of development time, but early rumors of CoD 2023 just being a larger live service update for MW2, instead of a new game point towards CoD 2023 using the same engine as MW2. In this case the major development time would have been what? A year? Besides Blizzard enshittifying their first solid release in years for a few MTX bucks right now, CoD 2023 feels like the next thing to crash and burn like Vanguard. Bobby is driving the whole company into the ground and I feel like the acquisition cannot come fast enough for CoD to have any chance of long term survival.