this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
65 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13918 readers
739 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (10 children)

These animals are just existing.

Claiming we have a right to murder them for being in the wrong place is cruel - they have only spread there as a result of humanity.

Do we have a right to eradicate humanity in turn?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Humans can change their behavior and protect nature. Other invasive species cannot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

So we have a right to murder innocent animals because we, the most destructive species in history, have deemed them ā€œinvasiveā€?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do we have the right to stop a forest fire simply because we deem it dangerous?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Having the same moral value for a fire and living creature is wrong.

You can do a million things other than kill them to fix the problem… but killing them is cheapest, so that’s what’s done.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)