piggy

joined 5 months ago
[–] piggy@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

The egregious thing here is they've arrested more Jews for antisemitism which is just actually Palestinian liberation protests, and yet neonazis can just do this shit.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Mining and refining them is moreso about technological capacity

Economy of scale not technological capacity.

Essentially the problem is you have a yield of 84% iron 3% antimony for example. It only makes sense to use a nondestructive process to refine the antimony if you can make a profit on it, but with a 3% yield that is hard not only because of the small quantity, but it puts additional cost in refining out the iron later (or earlier). So sometimes you just say fuck it and only refine the iron.

The mine that the US just approved for antimony that's an ecological disaster is a gold mine that's like 2.5% antimony I think in terms of sampled yield.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] piggy@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

All Canadian energy is going to be 10%. I can only hope that in New England this is going to be the year where we yamagami regional energy conglomerate CEOs. Our prices are a cluster fuck because of inept government management (thanks "transition" fuel and "free market" energy) and the fact that our regional energy conglomerates are monopolies that have captured all regulation, to the point where they are freely admitting they haven't done proper maintenance and also that money is gone so they need to raise the rates to do maintenance. Obviously the YoY profit keeps coming.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

They killed thousands of ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine. They ran child camps teaching kids songs about killing and eating Russians, which journalists went to and got on video. They terrorized ethnic Russians, tortured and killed them and their families.

War crimes in the DNR/LNR are not the same as what you were implying. You're completely mixing shit up when it suits your argument.

Songs about killing Russians have been in Ukraine since time immemorial and have been taught to children since time immemorial. A large portion of Kolomyika songs over the last 2 centuries are about hating Russians in some way. You're entirely culturally out of your depth. For example the famous "Гуде-шумить сосоночка ", or "The Pine Trees Hum and Rustle" has the line:

Ви, москалі, людоїди, You (slur) Russians are cannibals

It was literally recorded in the USSR in 1988 for the first time and is a folk song from time immemorial. You're literally out of your depth in figuring out what is and isn't Nazi. You don't even speak any of the languages involved.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

Russia effectively exports white people to Israel, they're very cozy. Russia is Israel's main supplier of oil. Which is why the Ukraine and Gaza Wars have always been funny from the nato-cool perspective.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

this is who they sent to fight the Ukrainian Nazis

Ukraine has a ton of Nazis in power who were specifically targeting ethnic Russians.

This is actually a farce of a point, Ukrainian Nazis aren't stupid. They don't have enough real support to go blackshirts on Russians. If this was the case the original "de-Nazification" argument would have taken a lot better and a lot quicker in Russia. Ukrainian Nazis went after extremely soft targets like Romani, Jews, and foreigners. "De-russification" has (stupidly IMO) been the most democratic policy post-Maidan. The outsized influence of Nazis in Ukraine has been because they're effective at hiding behind/within the government and popular sentiment. The reason Ukrainian Nazis are entrenched is because they get bureaucratic positions, they do absolutely terribly in the polls.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What's important to figure out is "how out in the cold are they"? Did we pull back intelligence? Are they relying on laughs Britain?

Like is the Kid Starver MI6 and Royal Airfarce supposed to be supplementing their field. The materiel is pointless without the actual intelligence. The US is essentially their lifeline to geostationary battlefield intelligence. Without that they have absolutely nothing in comparison.

1
doomerism is over (hexbear.net)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by piggy@hexbear.net to c/doomer@hexbear.net
 

As an aesthetic doomerism is over. What once was a delightful tongue and cheek way to explain the reality of the world has effectively been turned into a death cult and a liberal cudgel. Without a clear purpose doomerism in general online spaces is simply another meme based commodity form whose entertainment value undermines any unique world view or political education value it provided previously. In short, it's over, go home.

The progression of doomerism to a death cult has been the most obvious one. It's meme value has shifted from being lived experience of lower class people in a capitalist hellscape to pure copium whose ultimate argument is that you the meme consumer, can die happy knowing you're right. That's it's only current use. The stories have all been told. Doomerism used to explicate the inherent alienation in our modern world, the difficulties in relating to an ever changing world that is always changing seemingly for the worse in unexciting and seemingly permanent ways. Today it's political valence is closer to various anti-civilization anarkiddies, preppers, and the ultra-rich who are burning their cash before the atmosphere rightfully chokes the life out of their lungs.

What doomer has given the craven center left is a lovely thought terminating cliche to defend themselves against accusations of ineptitude. If I'm a center-left presidential candidate who has tons of policy wonks and "documents", but no real plans, doomer is so useful. If anyone asks me:

  • You said couldn't be done before what changed?
  • You want to do , but what are you going to do against the overwhelming capital opposition?
  • Your plan doesn't account for the reality on the ground and it might not even be effective because of that, how can you push this?

I can simply smirk and say "Well I believe that change is possible doomer". I've noticed this a lot of with people whose personalities are often a pastrami sandwich of thinly layered commodity-forms. That anything that is against their toxic optimism is "doomer". Anything that forces them to think critically about how things are, and what we should do? Doomer. Anything statement/art/position that is hard or challenging regardless of any other valence is doomer. Doomer is effectively a cudgel primarily used by cosmopolitan liberals to label you a party pooper.

This creates a ratchet effect for belief systems, in the same sense that Democrats are a rachet for the US government. The more doomerism is used in this way, the less effect political change has, the more problems fester, the underlying problems become harder, prompting a much lower bar for allegations of doomerism in the next cycle.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah too bad gns implements rate limiting and bad actor protection by essentially mimicking butt coin and requiring proof of work.

Trust is not a technologically solvable problem. This includes current DNS systems because ownership is effectively a proof of stake.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hey buddy some of us jork it to the mDNS RFC every single day

 

The latest struggle session has been the most productive and cooperative shit I've seen in a few struggle sessions.

Damn guys I think we're onto something here.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm not entirely sure what you mean tbh. Like if something changes in a library you linked against? I guess you would have to rebuild it but you would have to rebuild a shared library too and place it into the system. Actually, you don't necessarily have to rebuild anything, you can actually just relink it if you still have object files around (like OpenBSD does this to relink the kernel into a random order on every boot), just swap in a different object file for what you changed

Okay let's say I am writing MyReallyCoolLibrary V1. I have a myReallyCoolFunction(). You want to use myReallyCoolFunction in your code. Regardless if your system works on API or ABI symbols, what a symbol is is a universal address for a specific functionality. So when my library is compiled it makes a S_myReallyCoolFunction, and when your app is compiled it makes a call S_myReallyCoolFunction and this symbol needs to be resolved from somewhere.

So static linking is when you compile the app with S_myReallyCoolFunction inside of it so when it sees call S_myReallyCoolFunction it finds the S_myReallyCoolFunction in the app data. Dynamic linking is when it finds call S_myReallyCoolFunction in a library that's a file on your machine. Plan9 uses static linking.

So let's talk about this what it means for "code portability". Let's say I make an MyReallyCoolLibrary V1 and I have to change a few things, here are alternate universes that can happen:

  • I don't change myReallyCoolFunction
  • I change myReallyCoolFunction but I do not change its behavior, I simply refactor the code to be more readable.
  • I change myReallyCoolFunction and I change its behavior.
  • I change myReallyCoolFunction and change it's interface.
  • I remove myReallyCoolFunction.

So let's compute what this should mean for encoding a Symbol in this case.

  • myReallyCoolFunction from V2 can stay declared as S_myReallyCoolFunction
  • myReallyCoolFunction from V2 can stay declared as S_myReallyCoolFunction
  • myReallyCoolFunction from V2 has to be declared as S_myReallyCoolFunctionNew
  • myReallyCoolFunction from V2 has to be declared as S_myReallyCoolFunctionNew
  • I technically no longer have an S_myReallyCoolFunction

Now these are the practical consequences for your code:

  • none, everything stays the same and code written to V1 can use V2.
  • none, everything stays the same and code written to V1 can use V2.
  • app refactor - everything written for V1 has to change to use V2. The app may no longer be able to work with V2.
  • app refactor - everything written for V1 has to change to use V2.The app may no longer be able to work with V2.
  • app refactor - everything written for V1 has to change to use V2.The app may no longer be able to work with V2.

So now to make code truly portable I must now remove the app refactor pieces. I have 2 ways of doing that.

  1. Version resolution from inside the system by managing lib paths most likely.
  2. V2 must include all symbols from V1

With #1 you have the problem everyone complains about today.

With #2 you essentially carry forward all work ever done. Every mistake, every refactor, every public API that's ever been written and it's behaviors must be frozen in amber and reshipped in the next version.

There is no magic here, it's a simple but difficult to manage diagram.

Plan 9 is a carefully tuned system ofc and I obviously have the Plan 9 brainworms but like.....

I agree that Plan 9 is really cool, but in practice Linux is the height of active development OS complexity that our society is able to build right now. Windows in comparison is ossifying, and OSX is much simpler.

I've never written any programs that were subject to such strict verification tbh. I had to look up what "DSL" means lol, Wikipedia says "definitive software library".

DSL in this case means Domain Specific Language

I rly think it's not such a problem most of the time, code changes all the time and people update it, as they should imo,

But here's the problem with this statement, it unravels your definition of "code portability". The whole point of "code portability" is that I don't have to update my code. So I'm kind-of confused about what we're arguing if it's not Flatpak style portability, it's not code portability, what are we specifically talking about?

And that formal verification can only get you as far as verifying there are no bugs but it can't force you to write good systems or specifications and can't help you if there are things like cosmic rays striking your processor ofc hehe

The formal verification can only reify the fact that you need something called Foo and I can provide it. The more formal it is the more accurate we can make the description of what Foo is and the more accurately I can provide something that matches that. But I can't make it so that your Foo is actually a Bar because you meant a Bar but you didn't know you needed a Bar. We can match shapes to holes but we cannot imbue the shapes or the holes with meaning and match on that. We can only match geometrically, that is to say (discrete) mathematically.

I agreee, this isn't just a technological problem to me but also a social one. Like ideally I would love to see way more money or resources for computer systems research and state-sponsored computer systems. Tbh I feel like most of the reason ppl focus so much on unchanging software, ABIs, APIs, instruction sets, operating systems, etc is cuz capitalists use them to make products and them never changing and just being updated forever is labor reducing lol. When software is designed badly or the world has changed and software no longer suits the world we live in (many such cases), we (the community of computer-touchers lol) should be able to change it. Ofc there will be a transition process for anything and this is quite vague but yeh

I generally agree with this sentiment but I think the capitalist thing defeating better computing standards, tooling, and functionality is the commodity form. The commodity form and its practical uses don't care about our nerd shit. The commodity form barely cares to fulfill the functional need it's reified form (e.g. an apple) provides. That is to say, the commodity form doesn't care if you make Shitty Apples or Good Apples as long as you can sell Apples. That applies to software, and as software grows more complex, capitalism tends to produce shitty software simply because the purpose of the commodity form is to facilitate trade not to be correct/reliable/be of any quality.

[–] piggy@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah your router might have a hosts functionality. All routers are a bit different so I can't give direct instructions.

You can also try setting up your own custom DNS there's a post in the comments here somewhere describing how.

 

You should have kept it going until the last day of the auction, there'd be guaranteed salt on World

 

Uncommon Sense was a Common Vice

Those with knowledge of the United States Marine Corps will recognize the irony of this title. I wish its words were not true, but as I write this, I believe they are.

Currently, there is an effort to cull a significant number of career Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This is an unthinkable action that will gravely undermine the security of the nation well beyond what many of our citizens are aware. For those seeking to raise their awareness, I offer this vignette, free of political bias or moral judgment. It is not about any one person, but an amalgamation of multiple FBI Special Agents.

I am the coach of your child’s soccer team. I sit next to you on occasion in religious devotion. I am a member of the PTA. With friends, you celebrated my birthday. I collected your mail and took out your trash while you were away from home. I played a round of golf with you. I am a veteran. I am the average neighbor in your community. This is who you see and know. However, there is a part of my life that is a mystery to you, and prompts a natural curiosity about my profession.

This is the quiet side of me that you do not know: I orchestrated a clandestine operation to secure the release of an allied soldier held captive by the Taliban. I prevented an ISIS terrorist from boarding a commercial aircraft. I spent 3 months listening to phone intercepts in real time to gather evidence needed to dismantle a violent drug gang. I recruited a source to provide critical intelligence on Russian military activities in Africa. I rescued a citizen being tortured to near death by members of an Outlaw Motorcycle Gang. I interceded and stopped a juvenile planning to conduct a school shooting. I spent multiple years monitoring the activities of deep cover foreign intelligence officers, leading to their arrest and deportation. I endured extensive hardship to infiltrate a global child trafficking organization. I have been shot in the line of duty.

Something else about me, I was assigned to investigate a potential crime. Like all previous cases I have investigated, this one met every legal standard of predication and procedure. Without bias, I upheld my oath to this country and the Constitution and collected the facts. I collected the facts in a manner to neither prove innocence nor guilt, but to arrive at resolution.

I am now sitting in my home, listening to my children play and laugh in the backyard, oblivious to the prospect that their father may be fired in a few days. Fired for conducting a legally authorized investigation. Fired for doing the job that he was hired to do. I have to wonder, when I am gone, who will do the quiet work that is behind the facade of your average neighbor?

9
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by piggy@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net
 

My new alternative history theory is that if the Italian Partisans didn't execute and parade around Mussolini, then the US government would have given him a job. In this grim future the "Fash Squad" in congress would be headed be Alessandra Mussolini instead of the horrizontalist leaderless faction that exists now as a tenuous confederation of Bobert, Mace and Greene.

I thank the CLN every day for taking responsibility for for their own country's messes. rat-salute-2

 

Guys the empire is over, we're outsourcing concentration camps and prisons. What's even left of the economy? Is Trump really gonna tell the grandpas of America that they fell out of the guard tower for nothing?

141
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by piggy@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
 
 

Yes I am a socialist "comedian".

You know Marx Never Predicted(TM) get this bread and circuses, a concept centuries older than him. He didn't have entire volumes written about how religion was the biggest bread and circus that you couldn't blame people for believing.

https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/255/oa_monograph/chapter/2791913

Treatlerism is not a new concept, it's merely that Matt Christman has explained it to you in brain rot terms so the dumbest comedian could falsely accuse Marx of being stupider than him, while still claiming to be a Marxist.

I'm gonna take a page from the way that the US Forest Service runs it's shitty museums and ask, when have you employed critical thinking and applied abstract concepts to the way you live your life?

 

This is clearly the most powerful thing music has ever done if you're really putting numbers on the board. An evil bard enchants your presidential candidate to fall flat on her face. This almost makes brat cool again.

Also she performed Guess and half of it was censored.

37
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by piggy@hexbear.net to c/music@hexbear.net
 

So I'm watching the Grammies and I see a music video starting, and it's fucking Gaga (Abracadabra was the song). Like Classic Gaga. I fucking hated Andy Worhol Gaga, Tony Bennette and Target PRIDE Gaga. But it was fucking classic fucking Lady Gaga like Fame, and Fame Monster. She was so great, she was giving Griffith Berzerk and Bloodborne in the same fucking video. It was true to her fucking roots in custom couture that you'd mistake for Alexander McQueen.

It's a fucking Mastercard commercial. I'm gonna kill myself.

 

Look at the fucking Pixels and kerning on the bumper stickers and the "Foo County" badge for the fake Kia Soul.

They're such fucking idiots.

27
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by piggy@hexbear.net to c/electoralism@hexbear.net
 

Meet the new head of the DNC.

Watch the video on Ken Klip's page to just hear the sound bite, then look at fun excerpt from Salon which is still a lib rag:

Martin went on to say that it’s important for voters to feel like “we’re not taking money from the people that are working against them,” adding: “There are a number of billionaires in this country that have no interest in helping the working class in this country.” Asked who, specifically, he would not take money from, Martin said: “There’s too many to name.”

“There are a lot of good billionaires out there that have been with Democrats, who share our values, and we will take their money, but we’re not taking money from those bad billionaires,” Martin said.

Wikler responded to the question by saying: “We’re not going to take money from people who are actively union busting. We’re not going to take money from the people who funded Stop the Steal.” He added, “If they try to donate we’re going to send that money back.”

When the whole panel was asked whether any of the candidates would support a blanket ban on campaign contributions from tech executives — the same class of billionaires mentioned by former President Joe Biden in his farewell address as forming an American oligarchy — none of the candidates would commit.

Now for a fun excerpt from Da Hill which is a blue stenographer for power and doesn't question anything:

Martin said in an interview with The Hill last year that he saw a multi-faceted role for the DNC amid a second Trump administration — both resisting “the really extremes and excesses of the Trump administration” and defining the Democrats’ priorities.

“You have to give people a sense of who you are and who the party is, who we’re fighting for, and why and that means, you know, if we’re focused the whole time on just resisting Trump, we’re not giving people a sense of who we are and why they should support us,” Martin told The Hill.

Other Democrats agree that the party cannot be in resistance mode all the time.

“There’s a big difference between being the political opposition party and just pure resistance,” former Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.) told The Hill.

They're trying to sell "bipartisanship" as "standing for something" (pretending they "hear you, see you") by saying that they cannot be "da #resistance" but they have to be an "opposition party" which they are classically not.

As a treat enjoy this Ryan Grim prediction / quote-Tweet where Wikler laid out out his platform of austerity for the DNC consultant class.

view more: next ›