fodor

It's not we that have become evil. I think it's imperative that people properly consider who is doing the evil shit.

Many years ago I was visiting some country in Central America, and they were not angry that I was American even though the American government had done horrible things to their country, because they knew that I had no control over what those crazy motherfuckers did.

And that doesn't mean that everyone is powerless, that we shouldn't try to make a difference. That's a different conversation.

When you say most countries, which countries are you talking about?

And if you're wondering where the US goes for help, I'm not sure what you mean, but there have been a variety of peacekeeping missions and wars over the past few decades where other countries worked alongside the United States. Whether you think those military operations were justified is a different question, but if you're looking for which countries worked together, you can easily find out by browsing Wikipedia for 20 minutes.

I love the blind comment by the guy. He says people are sick of drama about what's happening inside the DNC. Obviously almost nobody in the country gives one flying fuck about that. We all care what the DNC does, not have they have little power disputes.

To be more precise, we care that the DNC doesn't give a damn for the average American, and they've shown no signs of improving for the last 20+ years.

Trust your instincts. If it's really easy to write LLM prompts and generate consistently useful quality output, then there's no chance you'll make a lot of money doing so. You won't even make a little money doing so, because that work will be outsourced to another country with a lower minimum wage.

Of course that's the point. The AI snake oil sales people want bosses to believe that they can underpay or fire employees, but we know that it doesn't work that way, that all of these companies are just screwing about to make a little bit of money for either the shareholders or the bosses or both.

It is interesting how people think that they know exactly what they're going to write before they even start. Of course, most professional writers will tell you otherwise. You have to put the words on paper to see how they fit and to see if you're happy with them.

That's what they're banking on, but we know that eventually they will f*** it up and lose everyone.

Probably the pipes get ugly if the plumber is trying to install 11s and 22s. Probably they will have a different idea.

Right, and on the other hand they are risking state prison.

If they are acting illegally, they could in theory face state charges for assault and battery. In theory. Because they have no arrest powers. Maybe. Right? That's the tricky point.

So they would have to be super confident to not find out the scope of their authority.

The article is also full of bullshit and it gets basic history wrong. The agreement was never made, but to the extent it exists anyway, it was never supposed to be about a monopoly that's destroying shit. Once upon a time, not even very long ago, there were competing search engines.

I know tech writers want to write stories that sound fancy, but if they don't know the facts and the history then they need to find someone to proofread their work more carefully.

And maybe that's okay, isn't it?

The whole article is based on lying liars trying to spin propaganda stories. Yeah, they'll say in public that they're going to stop cracking down on farm workers, but will they actually do that? Of course not. They'll just crack down on places that haven't paid their Trump bribes properly.

You would think that major media outlets would stop taking the administration at its word, but you wouldn't think a lot of things that haven't come true.