Railison

joined 2 years ago
[–] Railison@aussie.zone 41 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I mean, if the reactors are already built and have plenty of life left in them…

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Planning to do nothing isn’t an absence of plans!

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I always wanted to follow along, but I could never master the trick where I could reach over and get a half-done one out of nowhere to keep working on.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

🪨 💃 << You

Have you seen the stuff she posts regularly?

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Laughs in Australia

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I sorta wanna pre-poll and rock up on polling day for the sausage. Is this unpatriotic?

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Enshittification knows no bounds

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 7 points 3 months ago

Then there’ll be a THEY — Total High Efficiency Yield

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I remember back then it was easier installing the OS than installing third party software 🫣

[–] Railison@aussie.zone -2 points 3 months ago

The UK government can amend the law. This wasn’t surprising.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Oh hi ace_of_based, I didn’t ~~realize~~ know it was you

 

Keen to hear people’s thoughts. Personally I think the SRL will change how Melbourne works in ways current modelling won’t consider. That comes at a high cost, but is it too high?

 
 

Part of me is inclined to say might as well keep going with the games, but then I think sunk cost fallacy.

Does anyone even care about the commonwealth games?

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Railison@aussie.zone to c/melbournetrains@aussie.zone
 

Train is listed as stopping at MCE but the train’s stopping pattern says not.

 

Crown Resorts’ lawyers have warned the federal court that the casino operator would face “significant financial hardship” if forced to immediately pay its $450 million settlement with Australia’s financial crimes regulator Austrac.

Crown and Austrac jointly agreed to the settlement, over the group’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism failings, in May but need court approval.

Crown Resorts claims in court it would face “financial hardship” if forced to immediately pay its $450m settlement. The settlement would see Crown take two years to complete the $450 million payment.

Justice Lee said that the $450 million figure may be acceptable, albeit at the lower end of an acceptable range, but indicated that the actual value of the settlement - once the instalment payments are taken into account - is just $405 million and might not be within the acceptable range.

“If they have to pay the whole amount in a lump sum, they need to enter into negotiations, and the CFO [chief financial officer] of the company says, ‘I’m uncertain as to the outcome of such negotiations, given the impact of the challenging trading conditions’,” Crown’s barrister, Philip Crutchfield, KC, told the court today.

The hearing continues.

 

Not the usual sort of post here, but this one is something I’m familiar with after having bathrooms re-tiled and balconies band-aided (due to be done properly at some stage when I get around to it).

view more: ‹ prev next ›