this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
304 points (100.0% liked)

196

18073 readers
1061 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From: “Red Rosa: A Graphic Biography of Rosa Luxemburg” by Kate Evans.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] photonic_sorcerer 60 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

The hexbears won't like this one.

But I do! Good post, OP.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, but hexbear has a variety of leftist ideologies, including those friendly to the work of Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman

[–] photonic_sorcerer 53 points 2 years ago

Yet somehow only the smelliest turds float to the top...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

There’s a great episode of Rev Left Radio with the author, highly recommend!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is going to make a lot of people from instances that end in .ml very angry.

Prepare for the textwalls!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not seeing a lot of textwalls.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

I think a large part of the reason why is these guys defederated the riff-raff pretty early on.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's annoying is that we probably would be a whole lot closer to actual communism and anarchism if the bolsheviks never took power and destroy all the communism that was happening during the Russian revolution.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yup, and for a deep dive into the history of how this happened in both the USSR and Maoist China, I'd recommend Anark's series The State is Counterrevolutionary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

The State is Counterrevolutionary

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

MLs: "The only way to socialism is through violent, top-down revolution."

Syndicalists, getting every W known to man: "Are we a joke to you??"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What on earth is a top-down revolution? Wouldn't that just be a coup?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Yup, also called a bourgeois revolution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The idea is to reverse the pyramid of power, so that the working class, which is usually at the bottom, becomes the top and the ruling class gets at the bottom. That way it would break any hierarchies

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dr. Wolff made a great video today about this very topic! It essentially boiled down to saying that a socialist revolution can only succeed if there is also a revolution in the workplace. Workers need to elect their managers, and have a strong union to coordinate production between industries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

That was a really great episode, thanks for the shoutout! I usually only catch Economic Update on my local Leftist radio, but with that description I just had to seek it out, and I’m glad I did.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

A tankie will tell you to "read theory" and then get miffed if you read Rosa Luxemburg.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Not in my experience, but we’re all entitled to our own experiences, so I can’t fault you for yours.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

"Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" -- Benjamin Franklin

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Trading liberty for safety is the entire point of a society, you absolute dunce.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Toxic child

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm betting this one goes well over your head, lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's gone over my head, exactly? The entire purpose of a rules based society is you're protected, mostly from other people.

So please, explain it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Temporary" is the key word in that sentence. Benjamin Franklin said this famous quote in response to the governor of Pennsylvania being asked to levy a new tax to support the French and Indian war, which an old money family, the Penns, who ruled from afar, were trying to bribe him to veto. Ben Franklin was very much in favor of this tax and very much pro big government, so long as it was being done by the people (contrary to what all the libertarians who quote him seem to think). His argument was that if the governor kept taking bribes from the Penns, and just rolling over and doing whatever they told him to do, consequences to the state be damned, just so the Penns would keep the money flowing, he deserved whatever was coming to him when they decided to stop.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Imagine being this dense

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

You heard it first from old Ben, stop saving money for retirement, you’re just giving up on your current liberty to have some temporary safety later in life.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The irony that in this quote he was supporting the authority of government specifically on taxation for long term defense. "Temporary" was kind of the whole point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Which is precisely why it works in this context. He was talking about the Pennsylvania governor's ability to levy a new tax which some Englanders who ruled from afar were trying to bribe him to veto. His argument was that if people gave up their ability to govern themselves and let some faraway Leviathan do it in the hopes that said Leviathan would keep them safe, they deserved whatever was coming to them. I think this translates nicely onto "Socialism is not some Christmas gift for those who accept a dictator now in the hopes of achieving freedom in the future."