this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

3008 readers
115 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I don't believe that without some extremely substantial evidence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Honestly, if they could essentially "remove" the limited context window, I would be tempted to call it AGI. Not perfect by any stretch, but good enough to pass my personal Turing Test.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So far, these things are clearly statistics with extra steps. Like you, I need to see some serious evidence before I would begin to believe this in the slightest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I think I'd be more easily convinced that humans are just statistics with extra steps than machine learning / language models such as ChatGPT are sentient.