this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13935 readers
541 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I laughed.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

@[email protected] was popping the fuck off in that thread

Even our mods have the heart of a poster

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

carcosa's banner goes hard right now posting

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

ONE OF US

ONE OF US

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A while ago, someone suggested having a second instance that federates with everyone, and that instance be the only one hexbear federates with. Like a demilitarized zone. I think it has merit, even though it's probably means much more work for the admins and more server overhead

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that's just lemmy.ml

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

or lemmygrad, but they've already been through hell and back

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I don't think it's that much more work if the sanctuary instance doesn't have a single comm. So, if you are logged on with the sanctuary account, you would see nothing under local and only Hexbear posts under All. The real work is vetting accounts that get created in the sanctuary instance. Most likely, account creation would be completely closed and only open to older Hexbear accounts with good standing.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

Who Moderates the Moderators? disgost

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I said that leftists shouldn't be doing open source platform development for libs and instead should be protecting lemmy with copyright so that libs can't use it. I was yelled at, but I will die on that hill maintaining I was correct.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I understand your argument. But I think @[email protected] and @[email protected] are big open-source people and want to give back to that community.

I can respect that for sure.

I am sure there has been some lemmy contributions from libs. So maybe there is some tangible upside to them being around. Lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm not trying to like call the devs libs or anything, and I'm appreciative of their work. . I understand why intellectual property is bad, and how open source is useful for auditing. My argument is just that we don't live in a world where leftists can do open source development and it won't just be taken by libs to be used in ways other than how we intended it to be used.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We also don't live in a world where leftists can trust a project that isn't open source to not just be a Fed honeypot. Not that it's safe to use Lemmy to organize anything real, but at least I know they aren't leaking my IP to atomwaffen or those Florida Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

That's why I said that I understand how it's important for auditing. You can publish the code and still protect it with copyright. I suppose someone could still steal it, but that's a few more hoops to jump through.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Well, they're getting paid for this shrug-outta-hecks

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

This is a new era of dunking and I am so here for it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Lmao it is pretty funny watching the libs go mask off and show how full of shit they are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

@[email protected] is an international Al treasure no I will not exain

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Starting on All for the lols - switching to Local for the peace of mind