this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
262 points (99.6% liked)

Beehaw Support

2857 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What I find ironic is that there has been so much encouragement to not be a lurker and comment. But, it's by logging out and being a lurker that you can actually see new content not available on your instance once a defed happens even if you subscribed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

There needs to be some sort of cross server account management so that users dont loose subscriptions. It would also be nice when opening de-federated community sub, it would simply forward user to their sever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty happy with this decision. I don't have time or the headspace for uncalibrated posts on otherwise interesting topics. It feels good here. Glad it's to remain that way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Completely understand why you're doing this. I think you want this place to be more like an alternative to Tildes that doesn't descend into rampant shitposting, and that's completely understandable.

It's a good thing I made an account on lemmy.world too, so I won't fully miss out on the fediverse at large. Only reason I did was because I originally thought my app to join Beehaw was rejected (in actuality, I just didn't get the sign-up email, couldn't be arsed to check my spam folder and didn't even try to login for a month.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

That's kind of surprising, especially since there are communities that exist in those instances that do not exist here. I hope that at least, communities can sprout up here (pro wrestling or Green Bay Packers, anyone?)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Question: I've subbed to a few sublems from both Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works and I can still see their communities in my list and even interact with those subs. Is that normal? Or is all my content being ghosted on their end?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Understandable, but still sad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Thank you for your hard work and for creating this community, I hope it can continue to thrive. Still adjusting and taking everything in but it’s enjoyable!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (13 children)

How ironic! I had just subscribed to several communities on those instances this evening. Go figure. I guess I should reproduce my community subscriptions over on kbin. But wait, does this mean I can't even SEE that I subscribed to those communities here?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I made an account here after reading the mission statement. The very ideals beehaw stands for were the appeal. I support what you are doing, I want this to continue to feel a safe space.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I see this being a very slippery slope. Part of the nice thing about the fediverse is being able to interact with other communities on other instances. I can easily see Beehaw starting to defederate with more and more instances thereby severely limiting the amount of communities that are accessible. I see the trigger being pulled to defederate from every other instance just to stop any unwanted things from happening.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Firstly, I want to say I appreciate your dedication to creating a well moderated and maintained community.

However, I feel like this is an overall bad decision.

Essentially what I'm thinking is, how is this sustainable?

The amount of control that youre trying to achieve here is going to create an increasingly small and insular community. Also, there is a serious risk of burn out on the moderation end if you're attempting to currate this much, the more this server grows the harder this is going to be to maintain.

With the type of platform that this is, we're going to have a wide variety of people. A lot of them are just going to be bad people. Simply defederating won't fix this, and it will also be a problem here even with manually approved sign ups.

If people want to, they will just lie to get in. Essentially your system right now relies on people not lying to you when they sign up. A targeted harassment campaign could easily overcome that.

What's next? Are we going to deferate kbin.social and mastodon.social? Why don't we just defederate every instance? Even the biggest social media platforms have a seriously hard time moderating content they actually don't want on their platform. You can literally find porn on Youtube.

Tipping your hand on the scales this much is really stressful for a small team, and often doesn't lead to the outcomes that you thought you wanted. I hope in the near future you refederate, but I understand if you don't.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just want to point out, in early Mastodon days - People did defederate from mastodon.social because the moderation tools were not good enough.

With time and with better moderation tools, we believe we will refederate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean that sucks. I'm subscribed to the ginger community...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I honestly think it's ok to do this. Segregating instances that serve different goals in the Fediverse is not always a bad thing. As an example, the Mastodon creator having the same experience led to him implementing this very feature over there in the early days.

Yes, it does create inconveniences, especially now to all the new users that are already struggling with the concept of instances in general. I remember I did, and I was wondering, isn't that looming threat of defederation, taken together with the decision paralisys when being forced to select a home instance enough to make the whole service unusable for most users?

But thinkig a bit further ahead, I'd honestly still MUCH prefer this to the other outcome, which is those other, offending communities inevitably ending up being banned because the one big, overly cautious, profit-driven company under which all non-federated content lives has to sanitize its content for the advertisers.

So, yes, it might be cumbersome for some users who expected to use the service by cross-federating, for example by creating an account here and then subscribing to something like noncredibledefense on sh.itjust.works. They did both in good faith, probably being driven here because the sensible policies and promise of the protected stewardship on Beehaw seemed like a good home base, but also subscribing there because it's the best replacement community of the popular subreddit, and it sucks.

But to those we can say: The equivalent of a kiddy pool is not the same place as the deep ocean, so don't expect to access both with the same account! So to alleviate that, just go over to those instances and create another one – I know I did just that right when reading this post, because I definitely plan on subscribing to communities over there as well.

And yes, it would be nice if a more long-term solution was found to the above-mentioned problems of federation. Conceptually, I doubt it ever will, and I also don't buy the argument that federation of different instances is "just like email", because obviously, problems like this don't manifest with your email inbox.

But practically, these issues will be less impactful once things have stabilized a bit and the inevitable culling of instances sets it, eventually there's gonna be a couple big, established "standard" instances (some of them maybe even run by profit-driven companies!) that people know what they stand for and what to expect when signing up, and the federation as well as the paralysis will not be so important anymore.

Just keep in mind that, for most of us, these are the very early days on Lemmy, and hiccups along the way are to be expected, it's all (along with the whole Fediverse!) still very much "in beta" right now.

Ultimately, we'll probably have to learn to getting a bit more flexible with our instances and accounts on them, just like alt accounts on singular websites.

No hard feelings!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Doesn't look like I'm missing anything from those instances! I vaguely recall either subscribing or posting to something on lemmy.world but since I can't remember it obviously isn't important to me. Sounds like I can live without it. Thanks for the hard work keeping this together.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Geez, the concept of federation is already splintering. I understand you guys have your reasons but this just splinters the fediverse and makes it worse for users.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›