this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
437 points (99.5% liked)

196

18073 readers
950 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] Numuruzero 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Numuruzero 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was just joshing you, playing a little trick, I think it's for atheism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Lmao, "atheism"

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Anarchism. The circle-A drawn like that (without the lines extending beyond the circle) is how it's traditionally drawn.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

i don't understand how most of lemmy is pro-communist but also pro-anarchist at the same time

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

...different people with different opinions?

You do know lemmy isn't one person yeah?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Inside you are two wolves. One is communist, the other an anarchist.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Anarchism and communism are 95% the same in regards to goals. They just have different views on how to get there, that differ very little or a lot depending on the specific sub ideology, of which there are many. The 5% with different goals are some anarchist tendencies which want to keep markets and money, like mutualism. Everyone else wants a stateless, moneyless and classless society where people contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need on the basis of mutual aid. And no, "anarcho"-capitalism is not a thing, that's an oxymoron.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Personally I'd be a ok with just some wealth redistribution, but everyday without that I am getting more radicalized.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wealth redistribution is only resetting the board, not a change in the game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i like the game, just not my starting position

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Sounds like you should learn more about the history of the two concepts then, because they've never been mutually exclusive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I guess their different mental images of the final step of an ideal economic system under their chosen system has a lot of overlap.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I don't think you got a notification when Numuruzero said they're just joshing you, they think it's for atheism